<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Caffeine: I&#8217;ll take a large please.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fiftyonereasons.com/2009/08/googles-caffeine-ill-take-a-large-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fiftyonereasons.com/2009/08/googles-caffeine-ill-take-a-large-please/</link>
	<description>Interactive Media Development + Exploration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.fiftyonereasons.com/2009/08/googles-caffeine-ill-take-a-large-please/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiftyonereasons.com/?p=109#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I personally think Google and all other search engines are far from being efficient. Ancient I would say (with the near future&#039;s criteria).

They don&#039;t just need an upgrade, they need radical changes, research and innovation.
The results should be as precise as possible to what the user wants. The interface (which is totally useless today) should be made sophisticated enough to provide the engine precisely with what the user is searching for and the results should also be as precise as possible.
You can find out how efficient a search engine is today by dividing the really useful results with the massive amount of results you&#039;re getting.Then if you also consider how fast you can mine these useful results from the hundreds of thousands, you get the picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think Google and all other search engines are far from being efficient. Ancient I would say (with the near future&#8217;s criteria).</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t just need an upgrade, they need radical changes, research and innovation.<br />
The results should be as precise as possible to what the user wants. The interface (which is totally useless today) should be made sophisticated enough to provide the engine precisely with what the user is searching for and the results should also be as precise as possible.<br />
You can find out how efficient a search engine is today by dividing the really useful results with the massive amount of results you&#8217;re getting.Then if you also consider how fast you can mine these useful results from the hundreds of thousands, you get the picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
